The 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget: How Much to Spend, Where to Allocate, and the Metrics That Matter
The 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget: How Much to Spend, Where to Allocate, and the Metrics That Matter
The 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget: How Much to Spend, Where to Allocate, and the Metrics That Matter
The 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget: How Much to Spend, Where to Allocate, and the Metrics That Matter
The "growth at all costs" era for SaaS is officially over. The economic landscape has fundamentally shifted away from speculative spending fueled by readily available venture capital.
The "growth at all costs" era for SaaS is officially over. The economic landscape has fundamentally shifted away from speculative spending fueled by readily available venture capital.
The "growth at all costs" era for SaaS is officially over. The economic landscape has fundamentally shifted away from speculative spending fueled by readily available venture capital.
The "growth at all costs" era for SaaS is officially over. The economic landscape has fundamentally shifted away from speculative spending fueled by readily available venture capital.

Dylan Fields
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing
November 13, 2025
November 13, 2025
10
10
min read
min read


“About 5-10% of projected revenue should be dedicated to your marketing budget.”
This is the typical startup marketing budget advice.
The only problem is that most early-stage companies lack solid data to create accurate revenue projections.
Additionally, without historical data, marketing spend is typically distributed across various channels randomly.
Some channels never gain enough data to identify insightful patterns, making it impossible to improve performance.
As a result, growth flatlines, and the marketing budget can’t grow, making scaling even more difficult.
In this post, we’ll explain why this marketing budget advice is flawed and how we recommend most Series A B2B SaaS companies establish and distribute a marketing budget.
The "Golden Number": What's the Median SaaS Marketing Budget in 2026?
For leaders who need a quick, data-backed starting point, the 2026 benchmark is clear.
The median SaaS marketing spend for 2026 has stabilized at approximately 8% of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR).
This 8% figure has remained consistent, representing a tightening from the traditional 10-12% benchmarks cited in years past. This is not just a statistical blip; it's a narrative of efficiency. Boards are no longer greenlighting speculative 10-12% budgets without-iron clad proof of performance. The new 8% budget is leaner and must be more efficient, working harder to achieve what 10% used to.
It is also critical to understand what this 8% covers. This figure is just for the marketing department. The combined Sales & Marketing (S&M) budget—a figure investors scrutinize—is much higher, typically falling between 30% and 50% of revenue.
This combined S&M spend reveals a sharp divide based on funding, which we will explore next.
Why the "Median" Is a Misleading Starting Point: Budgeting by Context
Using the 8% median as a strict rule is a common mistake. The right budget for your company will be dictated by three key factors: your company stage, your funding source, and your primary growth goal.
Budgeting by Company Stage (The Growth Journey)
Your marketing spend as a percentage of revenue should decrease as your company matures.
Early-Stage (Startup / Pre-Product-Market Fit): At this stage, the company is "buying" market traction, data, and brand awareness. Spend is often 20-40% of revenue. More commonly, the budget is not based on revenue at all but is a fixed sum derived from seed funding, where it's common to invest 100% or more of early revenue into growth. The investment focus is on creating visibility, building credibility through thought leadership, and establishing strong SEO foundations.
Growth-Stage (Scaling / Post-Product-Market Fit): The company has found product-market fit and the goal is to capture the market. Spend remains high, often 10-20% for accelerated growth or as high as 40% for aggressive growth phases. The budget shifts to scalable, repeatable channels like performance marketing (PPC, paid social), content marketing at scale, and multi-channel strategies to expand reach.
Mature-Stage (Enterprise / Profitability Focus): The focus shifts from rapid acquisition to profitability, sustainability, and retention. Marketing spend drops to a more efficient 5-15% of revenue. The budget pivots heavily toward customer marketing, expansion revenue (upsell/cross-sell), partnerships, and brand defense.
Budgeting by Funding Model (The VC vs. Bootstrapped Divide)
The source of your capital is one of the clearest indicators of your budget strategy.
Data shows that VC-backed startups spend approximately 58% to 100% more on marketing as a percentage of revenue than their bootstrapped counterparts.
The reason is simple and logical:
VC-backed firms are capitalized to buy growth. They often operate at a significant loss, with total median spending at 107% of ARR. Only 46% are profitable or at breakeven.
Bootstrapped firms must earn growth efficiently. They operate at or near profitability, with total median spending at 95% of ARR. 85% of these companies are profitable or at breakeven.
Budgeting by Primary Goal (The "Rule of 40")
The VC-vs-Bootstrapped divide is ultimately a proxy for a deeper strategic choice: are you prioritizing growth or profitability?
The "Rule of 40" is a unifying framework investors use, stating that a healthy SaaS company's Revenue Growth Rate (%) + Profitability Margin (%) should equal or exceed 40%.
Your marketing budget is a primary lever to hit this target.
Aggressive Growth Strategy: A VC-backed firm might spend 40% of ARR on S&M to achieve 60% revenue growth, even with a -20% profit margin (60% - 20% = 40%). Their high budget is justified by the growth.
Efficient Growth Strategy: A bootstrapped firm might spend 15% on S&M to achieve 15% growth, while maintaining a 25% profit margin (15% + 25% = 40%). Their lower budget is also justified.
Your budget is not just a percentage; it's a strategic choice about how you plan to achieve your growth goals.
Table 1: 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget Benchmarks (% of ARR)
Company Stage | Bootstrapped / Efficient Growth | VC-Backed / Aggressive Growth |
Early-Stage (Startup) | 15-25% | 20-40%+ (or based on funding) |
Growth-Stage (Scale-Up) | 10-15% | 10-20% |
Mature-Stage (Enterprise) | 5-10% | 5-15% |
The Metrics That Justify Your Spend: A CFO-Friendly Guide
In 2026, a budget request without efficiency metrics is just a "spend." A budget with them is an "investment." The how much is meaningless without the how well.
The Problem: The High Cost of Acquisition
First, the bad news: it has never been more expensive to acquire a new customer.
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)—the total sales and marketing cost to get one new customer—remains a primary concern for every SaaS business. Companies often spend heavily to bring customers in before earning any revenue from them. This creates a fundamentally unsustainable model without a clear, data-driven strategy to ensure long-term profitability.
The Sustainability Metric: LTV:CAC Ratio
The Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) Ratio is the classic measure of your business model's long-term sustainability. It measures how much value a customer brings in over their lifetime versus the cost to acquire them.
Here are the 2026 benchmarks:
Ideal (3:1): This is the "golden ratio" for a healthy, scalable SaaS business. For every $1 spent on acquisition, you should aim to get $3 back over the customer's life.
Unsustainable (<2:1): You are spending too much to get customers and will burn through capital.
Inefficient (5:1+): This ratio, while profitable, often suggests you are under-investing in marketing and leaving growth on the table.
The 2026 North Star: CAC Payback Period
While LTV:CAC is a long-term projection, the CAC Payback Period is a critical metric for operators and investors in a cash-focused economy.
This metric, defined as the number of months it takes to recoup your CAC from a new customer, is king. While LTV is a 3-5 year projection, CAC Payback is a cash reality. It answers the CFO's most urgent question: "When do we get our money back?"
This metric often correlates with your Average Contract Value (ACV), but across the board, an "excellent" target for 2026 is to achieve a CAC Payback Period of 12-15 months.
Table 2: SaaS Efficiency Metrics Cheat Sheet (2026 Targets)
Metric | Unhealthy (Red) | Healthy / Ideal (Green) | Inefficient? (Yellow) |
LTV:CAC Ratio | < 2:1 | 3:1 + | 5:1 + |
CAC Payback Period | > 18 Months | 12-15 Months | < 9 Months |
How to Allocate Your 2026 Budget: The "Where"
Once you have your number (e.g., 8% of ARR) and your north star metrics (LTV:CAC, Payback Period), where should you deploy those dollars for maximum efficiency?
The 2026 Allocation: AI, Content, and Paid Channels
The simple "content vs. paid" debate is over. In 2026, the entire landscape is being redefined by Artificial Intelligence.
AI Engine Optimization (AEO): SEO is no longer just about ranking on Google. It's splitting into two distinct practices: "Google SEO" and "AI Engine Optimization" (AEO). With Google's AI overviews and the rise of tools like Perplexity, buyers are getting answers directly. Your goal is no longer just to rank; it's to be the source cited by the AI. Encouragingly, AI-driven referrals often convert at a 3x higher rate than traditional search.
Content Marketing (The Foundation): Content is the foundation for both Google and AI engines. But the type of content that wins is changing. Budgets are shifting heavily to video, which can claim 30-40% of content marketing spend. Overall, SEO and content marketing remain a core, high-ROI investment, commanding 15-25% of the total digital budget.
Paid Advertising (The AI-Driven Accelerant): Paid channels are now "AI-first". Platforms like Google's Performance Max are consolidating campaign types and automating granular controls. The 2026 strategy is less about manually tweaking bids and more about feeding the AI high-quality data, creative assets, and clear strategic oversight.
The Funnel-Based Allocation Model
Instead of guessing, a structured approach is to allocate your budget by funnel stage. This aligns spending directly with your growth objectives.
Table 3: Sample 2026 SaaS Budget Allocation (Funnel Model)
Funnel Stage | Avg. Allocation | Channels |
Top of Funnel (Awareness) | 30-40% | SEO, Content Marketing, Paid Social, PR |
Middle of Funnel (Consideration) | 30-40% | Webinars, Remarketing, Email Nurturing |
Bottom of Funnel (Conversion) | 20-30% | Paid Search, ABM, Demos, Sales Enablement |
Retention & Expansion | 5-10% | Customer Marketing, Community, CS Ops |
As Table 3 shows, while acquisition (ToFu/MoFu/BoFu) commands the vast majority of the budget, smart companies dedicate 5-10% of their spend specifically to customer marketing and expansion. Given that CAC is high, marketing to your existing customer base is one of the most efficient paths to revenue.
Trends & Traps: What's New for 2026
Your strategy is set. Now, be aware of the tailwinds (trends) to leverage and the headwinds (mistakes) to avoid.
Key Trends Shaping Your 2026 Budget
AI Is the Default, Not the Add-On: By 2026, over 80% of companies are expected to have deployed AI-enabled applications. This is no longer a separate "AI tool" line item; it's the default operating system for marketing. This includes everything from AI-first PPC campaigns to AI-driven content and "AI Engine Optimization".
The Rise of Short-Form Video & CTV: The pivot to video is accelerating. Budgets are actively shifting to video, which can claim 30-40% of total content spend. This isn't just long-form webinars; the focus is on short, workflow-based product videos (under 60 seconds) and exploring new high-growth channels like Connected TV (CTV) and streaming ads.
The "Nano-Influencer" & Creator Economy: The creator economy is scaling down to be more effective. In B2B, this means budgets are moving away from expensive, broad-reach macro-influencers and toward niche-specific experts and "nano-influencers" who hold genuine trust with a smaller, more relevant audience.
Common (and Costly) Budget Mistakes to Avoid
The "Industry Benchmark" Trap: The #1 mistake. Blindly copying the 8% median (or any benchmark) without a deep understanding of your specific company stage, funding model, or growth goals is a recipe for failure.
Guessing Your Media Mix on "Vibes": Allocating your budget by "putting a little everywhere to see what sticks" is a dangerous and wasteful habit. A modern budget doubles down on proven channels based on performance data, not feelings.
Using Last Year's Numbers: Reusing your 2025 plan for 2026 is a critical error. It ignores new market realities, new competitor actions, and crucial platform shifts (like the rise of AI-first ad platforms).
Starving Compounding Channels: Cutting the budget for SEO and content marketing because they don't show ROI in 90 days is a classic trap. These channels compound over time. Cutting them too early leaves you permanently dependent on the "sugar high" of expensive paid channels.
Setting Vague Objectives: A budget tied to goals like "boost brand awareness" or "drive more leads" is useless. Your 2026 budget must be tied to specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that connect directly to pipeline and revenue.
Conclusion: Your Budget Is a Strategy, Not Just a Number
As we have seen, the question "How much should I spend on marketing?" is a trick question. The 8% median is a starting point, not a destination.
Your 2026 budget is a strategic document that must be built on a clear, defensible foundation.
Your budget is a strategic lever to hit your specific growth goals.
Your context (company stage and funding model) dictates your spending range, which can be anywhere from 5% for a mature firm to over 40% for an early-stage startup.
In 2026, efficiency is the north star. You must obsessively track your LTV:CAC ratio (aiming for 3:1) and CAC Payback Period (aiming for 12-15 months).
Your budget allocation must evolve, embracing a funnel-based model and adapting to the new realities of AI-first advertising and AI Engine Optimization.
In this new era, the winning SaaS company will not be the one with the biggest marketing budget. It will be the one with the smartest one.
Build Your 2026 Growth Engine
Building a budget that balances aggressive growth with capital efficiency is the hardest challenge for a SaaS leader. At Blend, we don't just execute marketing campaigns; we build data-driven marketing engines that turn your budget into a predictable, efficient, and scalable source of revenue.
“About 5-10% of projected revenue should be dedicated to your marketing budget.”
This is the typical startup marketing budget advice.
The only problem is that most early-stage companies lack solid data to create accurate revenue projections.
Additionally, without historical data, marketing spend is typically distributed across various channels randomly.
Some channels never gain enough data to identify insightful patterns, making it impossible to improve performance.
As a result, growth flatlines, and the marketing budget can’t grow, making scaling even more difficult.
In this post, we’ll explain why this marketing budget advice is flawed and how we recommend most Series A B2B SaaS companies establish and distribute a marketing budget.
The "Golden Number": What's the Median SaaS Marketing Budget in 2026?
For leaders who need a quick, data-backed starting point, the 2026 benchmark is clear.
The median SaaS marketing spend for 2026 has stabilized at approximately 8% of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR).
This 8% figure has remained consistent, representing a tightening from the traditional 10-12% benchmarks cited in years past. This is not just a statistical blip; it's a narrative of efficiency. Boards are no longer greenlighting speculative 10-12% budgets without-iron clad proof of performance. The new 8% budget is leaner and must be more efficient, working harder to achieve what 10% used to.
It is also critical to understand what this 8% covers. This figure is just for the marketing department. The combined Sales & Marketing (S&M) budget—a figure investors scrutinize—is much higher, typically falling between 30% and 50% of revenue.
This combined S&M spend reveals a sharp divide based on funding, which we will explore next.
Why the "Median" Is a Misleading Starting Point: Budgeting by Context
Using the 8% median as a strict rule is a common mistake. The right budget for your company will be dictated by three key factors: your company stage, your funding source, and your primary growth goal.
Budgeting by Company Stage (The Growth Journey)
Your marketing spend as a percentage of revenue should decrease as your company matures.
Early-Stage (Startup / Pre-Product-Market Fit): At this stage, the company is "buying" market traction, data, and brand awareness. Spend is often 20-40% of revenue. More commonly, the budget is not based on revenue at all but is a fixed sum derived from seed funding, where it's common to invest 100% or more of early revenue into growth. The investment focus is on creating visibility, building credibility through thought leadership, and establishing strong SEO foundations.
Growth-Stage (Scaling / Post-Product-Market Fit): The company has found product-market fit and the goal is to capture the market. Spend remains high, often 10-20% for accelerated growth or as high as 40% for aggressive growth phases. The budget shifts to scalable, repeatable channels like performance marketing (PPC, paid social), content marketing at scale, and multi-channel strategies to expand reach.
Mature-Stage (Enterprise / Profitability Focus): The focus shifts from rapid acquisition to profitability, sustainability, and retention. Marketing spend drops to a more efficient 5-15% of revenue. The budget pivots heavily toward customer marketing, expansion revenue (upsell/cross-sell), partnerships, and brand defense.
Budgeting by Funding Model (The VC vs. Bootstrapped Divide)
The source of your capital is one of the clearest indicators of your budget strategy.
Data shows that VC-backed startups spend approximately 58% to 100% more on marketing as a percentage of revenue than their bootstrapped counterparts.
The reason is simple and logical:
VC-backed firms are capitalized to buy growth. They often operate at a significant loss, with total median spending at 107% of ARR. Only 46% are profitable or at breakeven.
Bootstrapped firms must earn growth efficiently. They operate at or near profitability, with total median spending at 95% of ARR. 85% of these companies are profitable or at breakeven.
Budgeting by Primary Goal (The "Rule of 40")
The VC-vs-Bootstrapped divide is ultimately a proxy for a deeper strategic choice: are you prioritizing growth or profitability?
The "Rule of 40" is a unifying framework investors use, stating that a healthy SaaS company's Revenue Growth Rate (%) + Profitability Margin (%) should equal or exceed 40%.
Your marketing budget is a primary lever to hit this target.
Aggressive Growth Strategy: A VC-backed firm might spend 40% of ARR on S&M to achieve 60% revenue growth, even with a -20% profit margin (60% - 20% = 40%). Their high budget is justified by the growth.
Efficient Growth Strategy: A bootstrapped firm might spend 15% on S&M to achieve 15% growth, while maintaining a 25% profit margin (15% + 25% = 40%). Their lower budget is also justified.
Your budget is not just a percentage; it's a strategic choice about how you plan to achieve your growth goals.
Table 1: 2026 SaaS Marketing Budget Benchmarks (% of ARR)
Company Stage | Bootstrapped / Efficient Growth | VC-Backed / Aggressive Growth |
Early-Stage (Startup) | 15-25% | 20-40%+ (or based on funding) |
Growth-Stage (Scale-Up) | 10-15% | 10-20% |
Mature-Stage (Enterprise) | 5-10% | 5-15% |
The Metrics That Justify Your Spend: A CFO-Friendly Guide
In 2026, a budget request without efficiency metrics is just a "spend." A budget with them is an "investment." The how much is meaningless without the how well.
The Problem: The High Cost of Acquisition
First, the bad news: it has never been more expensive to acquire a new customer.
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)—the total sales and marketing cost to get one new customer—remains a primary concern for every SaaS business. Companies often spend heavily to bring customers in before earning any revenue from them. This creates a fundamentally unsustainable model without a clear, data-driven strategy to ensure long-term profitability.
The Sustainability Metric: LTV:CAC Ratio
The Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) Ratio is the classic measure of your business model's long-term sustainability. It measures how much value a customer brings in over their lifetime versus the cost to acquire them.
Here are the 2026 benchmarks:
Ideal (3:1): This is the "golden ratio" for a healthy, scalable SaaS business. For every $1 spent on acquisition, you should aim to get $3 back over the customer's life.
Unsustainable (<2:1): You are spending too much to get customers and will burn through capital.
Inefficient (5:1+): This ratio, while profitable, often suggests you are under-investing in marketing and leaving growth on the table.
The 2026 North Star: CAC Payback Period
While LTV:CAC is a long-term projection, the CAC Payback Period is a critical metric for operators and investors in a cash-focused economy.
This metric, defined as the number of months it takes to recoup your CAC from a new customer, is king. While LTV is a 3-5 year projection, CAC Payback is a cash reality. It answers the CFO's most urgent question: "When do we get our money back?"
This metric often correlates with your Average Contract Value (ACV), but across the board, an "excellent" target for 2026 is to achieve a CAC Payback Period of 12-15 months.
Table 2: SaaS Efficiency Metrics Cheat Sheet (2026 Targets)
Metric | Unhealthy (Red) | Healthy / Ideal (Green) | Inefficient? (Yellow) |
LTV:CAC Ratio | < 2:1 | 3:1 + | 5:1 + |
CAC Payback Period | > 18 Months | 12-15 Months | < 9 Months |
How to Allocate Your 2026 Budget: The "Where"
Once you have your number (e.g., 8% of ARR) and your north star metrics (LTV:CAC, Payback Period), where should you deploy those dollars for maximum efficiency?
The 2026 Allocation: AI, Content, and Paid Channels
The simple "content vs. paid" debate is over. In 2026, the entire landscape is being redefined by Artificial Intelligence.
AI Engine Optimization (AEO): SEO is no longer just about ranking on Google. It's splitting into two distinct practices: "Google SEO" and "AI Engine Optimization" (AEO). With Google's AI overviews and the rise of tools like Perplexity, buyers are getting answers directly. Your goal is no longer just to rank; it's to be the source cited by the AI. Encouragingly, AI-driven referrals often convert at a 3x higher rate than traditional search.
Content Marketing (The Foundation): Content is the foundation for both Google and AI engines. But the type of content that wins is changing. Budgets are shifting heavily to video, which can claim 30-40% of content marketing spend. Overall, SEO and content marketing remain a core, high-ROI investment, commanding 15-25% of the total digital budget.
Paid Advertising (The AI-Driven Accelerant): Paid channels are now "AI-first". Platforms like Google's Performance Max are consolidating campaign types and automating granular controls. The 2026 strategy is less about manually tweaking bids and more about feeding the AI high-quality data, creative assets, and clear strategic oversight.
The Funnel-Based Allocation Model
Instead of guessing, a structured approach is to allocate your budget by funnel stage. This aligns spending directly with your growth objectives.
Table 3: Sample 2026 SaaS Budget Allocation (Funnel Model)
Funnel Stage | Avg. Allocation | Channels |
Top of Funnel (Awareness) | 30-40% | SEO, Content Marketing, Paid Social, PR |
Middle of Funnel (Consideration) | 30-40% | Webinars, Remarketing, Email Nurturing |
Bottom of Funnel (Conversion) | 20-30% | Paid Search, ABM, Demos, Sales Enablement |
Retention & Expansion | 5-10% | Customer Marketing, Community, CS Ops |
As Table 3 shows, while acquisition (ToFu/MoFu/BoFu) commands the vast majority of the budget, smart companies dedicate 5-10% of their spend specifically to customer marketing and expansion. Given that CAC is high, marketing to your existing customer base is one of the most efficient paths to revenue.
Trends & Traps: What's New for 2026
Your strategy is set. Now, be aware of the tailwinds (trends) to leverage and the headwinds (mistakes) to avoid.
Key Trends Shaping Your 2026 Budget
AI Is the Default, Not the Add-On: By 2026, over 80% of companies are expected to have deployed AI-enabled applications. This is no longer a separate "AI tool" line item; it's the default operating system for marketing. This includes everything from AI-first PPC campaigns to AI-driven content and "AI Engine Optimization".
The Rise of Short-Form Video & CTV: The pivot to video is accelerating. Budgets are actively shifting to video, which can claim 30-40% of total content spend. This isn't just long-form webinars; the focus is on short, workflow-based product videos (under 60 seconds) and exploring new high-growth channels like Connected TV (CTV) and streaming ads.
The "Nano-Influencer" & Creator Economy: The creator economy is scaling down to be more effective. In B2B, this means budgets are moving away from expensive, broad-reach macro-influencers and toward niche-specific experts and "nano-influencers" who hold genuine trust with a smaller, more relevant audience.
Common (and Costly) Budget Mistakes to Avoid
The "Industry Benchmark" Trap: The #1 mistake. Blindly copying the 8% median (or any benchmark) without a deep understanding of your specific company stage, funding model, or growth goals is a recipe for failure.
Guessing Your Media Mix on "Vibes": Allocating your budget by "putting a little everywhere to see what sticks" is a dangerous and wasteful habit. A modern budget doubles down on proven channels based on performance data, not feelings.
Using Last Year's Numbers: Reusing your 2025 plan for 2026 is a critical error. It ignores new market realities, new competitor actions, and crucial platform shifts (like the rise of AI-first ad platforms).
Starving Compounding Channels: Cutting the budget for SEO and content marketing because they don't show ROI in 90 days is a classic trap. These channels compound over time. Cutting them too early leaves you permanently dependent on the "sugar high" of expensive paid channels.
Setting Vague Objectives: A budget tied to goals like "boost brand awareness" or "drive more leads" is useless. Your 2026 budget must be tied to specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that connect directly to pipeline and revenue.
Conclusion: Your Budget Is a Strategy, Not Just a Number
As we have seen, the question "How much should I spend on marketing?" is a trick question. The 8% median is a starting point, not a destination.
Your 2026 budget is a strategic document that must be built on a clear, defensible foundation.
Your budget is a strategic lever to hit your specific growth goals.
Your context (company stage and funding model) dictates your spending range, which can be anywhere from 5% for a mature firm to over 40% for an early-stage startup.
In 2026, efficiency is the north star. You must obsessively track your LTV:CAC ratio (aiming for 3:1) and CAC Payback Period (aiming for 12-15 months).
Your budget allocation must evolve, embracing a funnel-based model and adapting to the new realities of AI-first advertising and AI Engine Optimization.
In this new era, the winning SaaS company will not be the one with the biggest marketing budget. It will be the one with the smartest one.
Build Your 2026 Growth Engine
Building a budget that balances aggressive growth with capital efficiency is the hardest challenge for a SaaS leader. At Blend, we don't just execute marketing campaigns; we build data-driven marketing engines that turn your budget into a predictable, efficient, and scalable source of revenue.

Written by
Dylan Fields
When not hard at work, Danny can be found enjoying the outdoors, seeing live music, and exercising. Danny is passionate about data-informed decisions and strongly believes in implementing cohesive measurement frameworks to ensure all media is accountable for driving business outcomes. Throughout his career, he has developed full-funnel media strategies to drive both Brand Awareness and Growth objectives. He also loves ideating and activating first-to-market opportunities for clients to help brands stay innovative and at the forefront of their vertical.
More articles by
Dylan Fields
You might also like…
+91 6366 298 298
+91 6366 298 298
+91 6366 298 298
+91 6366 298 298
+91 6366 298 298








